IKEA’s decision to launch its resale platform in the UK has encouraged retailers to think about resale as a means of generating revenue and keeping customers within their ecosystem. Nishith Rastogi, Founder and CEO of Locus, explores the challenges – and opportunities – of reselling for furniture retailers.
Resale can extend the lifetime of a product – and the customer relationship around it. But for bulky goods such as furniture, the transaction does not end when a buyer and seller agree on a price. It ends when the item can be collected, transported and delivered at a cost that still makes the purchase worthwhile.
IKEA’s planned UK second-hand marketplace will enable IKEA Family members to buy and sell pre-owned furniture directly with one another. For retailers considering a similar service, resale offers a way to keep customers within the brand ecosystem as products change hands.
The opportunity is clear. The operational challenge is less visible.
A buyer who can collect a wardrobe locally may need little help from the marketplace. But for customers arranging transport, delivery can quickly erase the savings associated with buying second-hand. Retailers that help organise the journey can make resale accessible to more people – provided they can control the cost and complexity of moving each item.
For resale to scale, logistics cannot be treated as a service added after the sale. It needs to be designed into the marketplace from the beginning.
The hidden cost of collection
When a retailer sends new furniture to a customer, it knows the product’s dimensions, packaging and handling requirements. The item can be prepared for a scheduled collection and loaded according to a planned process.
Consumer-to-consumer resale is different. The seller’s home becomes the starting point, and the carrier has to work with the item and access conditions it encounters.
A wardrobe originally sold flat-packed may now be fully assembled. It may need to pass through narrow hallways, down stairs or through a restricted entrance. The carrier may require additional crew, equipment or time. If the item cannot be removed, the vehicle and crew have completed a journey without completing the job, while the buyer is still waiting for delivery.
The marketplace therefore needs to price not just the item, but the complexity of moving it.
That starts at the point of listing. Sellers should describe the product as it will actually travel, including its assembled or disassembled condition, dimensions, weight and access restrictions. The buyer’s address should be assessed with the same level of detail.
This information makes delivery costs more predictable before either household commits to an appointment. It also gives the operator a better view of the resources each job requires, creating the conditions to combine compatible collections and deliveries on the same vehicle or route.
Plan both ends together
Combining jobs can spread transport costs across several purchases, but furniture resale requires coordination between two households. The seller’s availability determines when an item can be collected; the buyer’s availability determines when it can be delivered.
Collection and delivery options should therefore be planned as one journey. If a flexible date allows an order to join an existing route, the marketplace could offer that option at a lower price where the saving supports it. Customers can then choose whether a faster or more convenient appointment is worth paying more for.
This approach turns logistics into part of the customer proposition. Delivery is no longer a fixed cost applied at checkout; it becomes a choice shaped by speed, convenience, flexibility and route efficiency.
Making that possible requires the marketplace booking system to connect with the carrier’s transport-management and route-planning systems. These platforms can assess where a collection fits alongside existing jobs, taking account of vehicle capacity, travel time, access conditions and the time required at both properties.
Increasingly, AI can improve those decisions by learning from historical journey times, access issues, failed collections and customer preferences. Appointment options can then reflect what the carrier can realistically deliver, helping the marketplace accept more orders without creating unnecessary journeys.
Initial complexity can therefore become consolidation.
Manage disruption in real time
Even the best plan will be affected by traffic, delays, failed collections or unexpected handling requirements. Real-time visibility is essential when several households and a carrier crew are connected to the same transaction.
If a crew is delayed collecting a wardrobe, updated arrival estimates can identify which later appointments are at risk. The carrier can adjust the schedule, alert the affected households or assign an upcoming collection to another suitable crew.
The important point is that these changes should reach drivers, sellers and buyers together. Customers are more likely to accept a revised appointment when they receive timely, accurate information rather than discovering that a delivery has simply failed to appear.
Automation also reduces the administrative burden. Staff should be able to focus on exceptions instead of repeatedly checking vehicle locations, recalculating schedules and calling customers with updates. That becomes increasingly important as the marketplace grows and more collections are taking place at the same time.
Measure the economics
For retailers to understand whether a second-hand strategy is working, logistics outcomes need to be reflected in the cost of every completed order.
Combining journeys should improve vehicle utilisation. Better listing information should reduce failed collections and repeat visits. More accurate appointment promises should reduce cancellations and customer-service contacts. Tracking these measures gives the retailer evidence of whether it can extend delivery to more buyers at a price they will accept.
The relevant metrics will include cost per completed order, route density, crew time, vehicle utilisation, failed-collection rates and the proportion of customers choosing flexible delivery windows. These measures can also show where the model needs refinement—for example, whether certain product categories or access conditions make delivery uneconomic.
Resale will not become a mainstream retail proposition simply because customers are willing to buy used goods. It will scale when retailers can make the movement of those goods predictable, affordable and operationally efficient.
For bulky products, logistics is not a supporting service around the marketplace. It is part of the marketplace itself.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
You are in: Home » Sustainability » GUEST COMMENT Why furniture resale depends on smarter delivery
GUEST COMMENT Why furniture resale depends on smarter delivery
Nishith Rastogi
IKEA’s decision to launch its resale platform in the UK has encouraged retailers to think about resale as a means of generating revenue and keeping customers within their ecosystem. Nishith Rastogi, Founder and CEO of Locus, explores the challenges – and opportunities – of reselling for furniture retailers.
Resale can extend the lifetime of a product – and the customer relationship around it. But for bulky goods such as furniture, the transaction does not end when a buyer and seller agree on a price. It ends when the item can be collected, transported and delivered at a cost that still makes the purchase worthwhile.
IKEA’s planned UK second-hand marketplace will enable IKEA Family members to buy and sell pre-owned furniture directly with one another. For retailers considering a similar service, resale offers a way to keep customers within the brand ecosystem as products change hands.
The opportunity is clear. The operational challenge is less visible.
A buyer who can collect a wardrobe locally may need little help from the marketplace. But for customers arranging transport, delivery can quickly erase the savings associated with buying second-hand. Retailers that help organise the journey can make resale accessible to more people – provided they can control the cost and complexity of moving each item.
For resale to scale, logistics cannot be treated as a service added after the sale. It needs to be designed into the marketplace from the beginning.
The hidden cost of collection
When a retailer sends new furniture to a customer, it knows the product’s dimensions, packaging and handling requirements. The item can be prepared for a scheduled collection and loaded according to a planned process.
Consumer-to-consumer resale is different. The seller’s home becomes the starting point, and the carrier has to work with the item and access conditions it encounters.
A wardrobe originally sold flat-packed may now be fully assembled. It may need to pass through narrow hallways, down stairs or through a restricted entrance. The carrier may require additional crew, equipment or time. If the item cannot be removed, the vehicle and crew have completed a journey without completing the job, while the buyer is still waiting for delivery.
The marketplace therefore needs to price not just the item, but the complexity of moving it.
That starts at the point of listing. Sellers should describe the product as it will actually travel, including its assembled or disassembled condition, dimensions, weight and access restrictions. The buyer’s address should be assessed with the same level of detail.
This information makes delivery costs more predictable before either household commits to an appointment. It also gives the operator a better view of the resources each job requires, creating the conditions to combine compatible collections and deliveries on the same vehicle or route.
Plan both ends together
Combining jobs can spread transport costs across several purchases, but furniture resale requires coordination between two households. The seller’s availability determines when an item can be collected; the buyer’s availability determines when it can be delivered.
Collection and delivery options should therefore be planned as one journey. If a flexible date allows an order to join an existing route, the marketplace could offer that option at a lower price where the saving supports it. Customers can then choose whether a faster or more convenient appointment is worth paying more for.
This approach turns logistics into part of the customer proposition. Delivery is no longer a fixed cost applied at checkout; it becomes a choice shaped by speed, convenience, flexibility and route efficiency.
Making that possible requires the marketplace booking system to connect with the carrier’s transport-management and route-planning systems. These platforms can assess where a collection fits alongside existing jobs, taking account of vehicle capacity, travel time, access conditions and the time required at both properties.
Increasingly, AI can improve those decisions by learning from historical journey times, access issues, failed collections and customer preferences. Appointment options can then reflect what the carrier can realistically deliver, helping the marketplace accept more orders without creating unnecessary journeys.
Initial complexity can therefore become consolidation.
Manage disruption in real time
Even the best plan will be affected by traffic, delays, failed collections or unexpected handling requirements. Real-time visibility is essential when several households and a carrier crew are connected to the same transaction.
If a crew is delayed collecting a wardrobe, updated arrival estimates can identify which later appointments are at risk. The carrier can adjust the schedule, alert the affected households or assign an upcoming collection to another suitable crew.
The important point is that these changes should reach drivers, sellers and buyers together. Customers are more likely to accept a revised appointment when they receive timely, accurate information rather than discovering that a delivery has simply failed to appear.
Automation also reduces the administrative burden. Staff should be able to focus on exceptions instead of repeatedly checking vehicle locations, recalculating schedules and calling customers with updates. That becomes increasingly important as the marketplace grows and more collections are taking place at the same time.
Measure the economics
For retailers to understand whether a second-hand strategy is working, logistics outcomes need to be reflected in the cost of every completed order.
Combining journeys should improve vehicle utilisation. Better listing information should reduce failed collections and repeat visits. More accurate appointment promises should reduce cancellations and customer-service contacts. Tracking these measures gives the retailer evidence of whether it can extend delivery to more buyers at a price they will accept.
The relevant metrics will include cost per completed order, route density, crew time, vehicle utilisation, failed-collection rates and the proportion of customers choosing flexible delivery windows. These measures can also show where the model needs refinement—for example, whether certain product categories or access conditions make delivery uneconomic.
Resale will not become a mainstream retail proposition simply because customers are willing to buy used goods. It will scale when retailers can make the movement of those goods predictable, affordable and operationally efficient.
For bulky products, logistics is not a supporting service around the marketplace. It is part of the marketplace itself.
Stay informed
Our editor carefully curates two newsletters a week filled with up-to-date news, analysis and research. Click here to subscribe to the FREE newsletter sent straight to your inbox. Why not follow us on LinkedIn to receive the latest updates on our research and analysis?
Read More
You may also like
Subscribe to our email community