A lot of brands use ROAS and ROI as their main KPI. – mainly because they were championed by Google and Facebook as measures for advertising, but are they the best way to measure retail media. Marketers like the immediacy and predictability of ROI and ROAS. However, the marketing community is recognising that these measures – although common – are far from perfect. ROI is a very different metric than ROAS.
Criteo’s recent report – The ROAS Trap – supports this. As it points out: “Retail Media consistently drives tremendous ROAS”, deeming it a critical metric to track. It’s retail media’s bread and butter.
Criteo’s global data shows that over the course of one year, brands that advertised with retail media
saw consistently high ROAS, with significant spikes during peak shopping seasons.
The Criteo report tries to answer the question “would consumers still buy from us if we don’t advertise?
It claims that its data shows that retail media is a “sure-fire way to consistently deliver strong incrementality results”, and it quotes two incrementality tests:
US brands that ran sponsored product ads saw a +428% incremental return on investment
EMEA brands that ran onsite display ads saw a bump of +160% sales per user.
These sorts of very high-level numbers are not something any marketer would base a campaign strategy on.
The key part to understand here is that the report uses the word ROI – and ROI is a very different metric to ROAS. Let’s look at the differences:
So, ROAS and ROI as imperfect KPIs. What are other metrics that matter? This quote from Steve McGowan, Head of Shopper Activation & Strategic Partnerships, Mondelez, is insightful: “We look at our investments across the entire ecosystem to deliver against our ultimate objective:incremental volume and sales growth. We use retail media to maintain, and more importantly grow, onlineand in-store incremental sales. This is crucial since a huge portion of our sales is still completed in-store,while a huge portion is digitally influenced”.
Ready for ROPO?
The concept of being digitally influences is called ROPO (research online, purchase offline). Shoppers who research more on Amazon, are more likely to buy, either on Amazon or off-Amazon. For every 10 customers who research on Amazon AND buy on Amazon, 17 other research on Amazon AND then buy off-site, according to a published paper by Professor Koen Pauwels.
The ROAS Trap by Criteo quotes an analysis that when it included offline attribution, campaigns saw a +42% average ROAS increase compared to campaigns that only looked at online attribution.
The ROAS Trap by Criteo quotes an analysis that when it included offline attribution, campaigns saw a +42% average ROAS increase compared to campaigns that only looked at online attribution.
How should brands think through the ROAS versus ROI conundrum? Here are some suggestions to get you thinking:
Think ‘Shopper Funnel’: Allocate your budget by percentage with your goals in mind for each step of the shopper funnel of ‘awareness’, ‘consideration’, ‘purchase intent’ and ‘purchase’ and ‘loyalty’. This will help you align your brand’s goals.
The Shopper Context: Retail media search does not operate in a vacuum: discounts, promotions, seasonality, non-retail media investments, and other factors meaningfully impact retail media performance.
Be Creative: breakthrough results come not from ROI, not from ROAS, not from efficiencies, but creativity. Creativity can deliver a 6.1x increase in effectiveness. What should marketers look for? Ad creative content that inspires emotion, triggers behaviour AND encourages an action.
Know the variables: budgetedspend, share of voice and share of spend, media types and audiences chosen all drive different outcomes.
Be Smart: while you might like ROAS, ROI or ‘new to brand’, ‘New to Brand’ by definition means an ROAS decrease.
Selling Period: key selling periods like Christmas or Prime Day drive a higher portion of sales simply by the increased traffic of shoppers ready with their wallets compared to how much a retail media ad can be estimated to have contributed.
Stay informed Our editor carefully curates a dedicated Retail Media newsletter on a bi-weekly basis, filled with up-to-date news, analysis and research, click here to subscribe to the FREE newsletter.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
You are in: Home » Retail Media » OPINION The ROAS versus ROI debate: what to do?
OPINION The ROAS versus ROI debate: what to do?
Colin Lewis
A lot of brands use ROAS and ROI as their main KPI. – mainly because they were championed by Google and Facebook as measures for advertising, but are they the best way to measure retail media. Marketers like the immediacy and predictability of ROI and ROAS. However, the marketing community is recognising that these measures – although common – are far from perfect. ROI is a very different metric than ROAS.
Criteo’s recent report – The ROAS Trap – supports this. As it points out: “Retail Media consistently drives tremendous ROAS”, deeming it a critical metric to track. It’s retail media’s bread and butter.
Criteo’s global data shows that over the course of one year, brands that advertised with retail media
saw consistently high ROAS, with significant spikes during peak shopping seasons.
The Criteo report tries to answer the question “would consumers still buy from us if we don’t advertise?
It claims that its data shows that retail media is a “sure-fire way to consistently deliver strong incrementality results”, and it quotes two incrementality tests:
These sorts of very high-level numbers are not something any marketer would base a campaign strategy on.
The key part to understand here is that the report uses the word ROI – and ROI is a very different metric to ROAS. Let’s look at the differences:
So, ROAS and ROI as imperfect KPIs. What are other metrics that matter? This quote from Steve McGowan, Head of Shopper Activation & Strategic Partnerships, Mondelez, is insightful: “We look at our investments across the entire ecosystem to deliver against our ultimate objective: incremental volume and sales growth. We use retail media to maintain, and more importantly grow, online and in-store incremental sales. This is crucial since a huge portion of our sales is still completed in-store, while a huge portion is digitally influenced”.
Ready for ROPO?
The concept of being digitally influences is called ROPO (research online, purchase offline). Shoppers who research more on Amazon, are more likely to buy, either on Amazon or off-Amazon. For every 10 customers who research on Amazon AND buy on Amazon, 17 other research on Amazon AND then buy off-site, according to a published paper by Professor Koen Pauwels.
The ROAS Trap by Criteo quotes an analysis that when it included offline attribution, campaigns saw a +42% average ROAS increase compared to campaigns that only looked at online attribution.
The ROAS Trap by Criteo quotes an analysis that when it included offline attribution, campaigns saw a +42% average ROAS increase compared to campaigns that only looked at online attribution.
How should brands think through the ROAS versus ROI conundrum? Here are some suggestions to get you thinking:
Stay informed
Our editor carefully curates a dedicated Retail Media newsletter on a bi-weekly basis, filled with up-to-date news, analysis and research, click here to subscribe to the FREE newsletter.
Read More
You may also like
Register for Newsletter
Receive 3 newsletters per week
Gain access to all Top500 research
Personalise your experience on IR.net